Delhi High Court Demands Security for Judicial Officers
The Delhi High Court criticized city authorities for not providing judicial officers with personal security, highlighting the contrast with other states. The court emphasized that lacking such protection compromises judicial independence, and urged budget allocations to ensure safety amidst high crime rates in the national capital.
- Country:
- India
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday took a stern stance against local authorities for failing to provide personal security officers (PSOs) to judicial officers, pointing out that such protections are available in other states.
Justice Manoj Jain chastised the Delhi Police during a hearing of a Judicial Service Association of Delhi petition, arguing that the lack of security could undermine the judiciary's independence. He questioned whether the authorities were treating security as a mere act of charity only considered when there's a threat perception.
The court urged budgetary considerations for security provisions, acknowledging that Delhi's crime rates warranted immediate protective measures for the over 700 judicial officers in the capital. The court further scheduled the next hearing for May.
ALSO READ
-
Delhi High Court Upholds Life Sentence in 1997 Murder Case
-
Judicial Independence Reaffirmed: Delhi High Court Judge Stands Firm
-
Independence Upheld: Delhi High Court Judge's Stand Against Pressure Tactics
-
Delhi High Court Holds Hockey India Secretary General in Contempt
-
Delhi High Court Rejects Unnao Survivor's Appeal for Death Penalty in Custodial Case