Supreme Court Critiques Cricket Associations' Nepotism and Mismanagement
The Supreme Court has expressed dissatisfaction over non-experts managing sports bodies, emphasizing that cricket associations should be led by retired cricketers. The ongoing legal battle concerns the Maharashtra Cricket Association, with allegations of nepotism and membership rigging at the center of the issue.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court criticized the management of cricket associations, voicing concerns over non-experts leading sports bodies. The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, stressed the need for retired cricketers at the helm, highlighting the expertise that former players can bring.
The court refused to modify the Bombay High Court's order halting the Maharashtra Cricket Association's elections, citing claims of favoritism. Chief Justice Kant questioned the sudden increase in MCA's membership, which saw a significant rise post-2023, contrary to its historical numbers.
The legal dispute emerged when former cricketer Kedar Jadhav accused the organization of rigging elections by adding new members linked to political figures. The court directed further arguments to be presented before the Bombay High Court for a swift resolution.
ALSO READ
-
Mamata Banerjee Challenges West Bengal Electoral Roll Revision in Supreme Court
-
Mamata Banerjee Challenges ED Plea in Supreme Court Over I-PAC Search Allegations
-
Daiwa's Strategic Dip into India's Wealth Management Sector
-
Supreme Court Upholds Justice in Arbitration Process
-
Supreme Court Ponders High-Stakes Trump Tariffs Case