Controversy Brews Over Punjab's Anti-Sacrilege Law

A petition challenges Punjab's anti-sacrilege law concerning the Guru Granth Sahib, alleging it violates constitutional equality and lacks President's assent. The law, enforcing life imprisonment for sacrilege, is deemed procedurally void by the petitioner, raising questions of secularism and fairness under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.

Controversy Brews Over Punjab's Anti-Sacrilege Law
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

A legal battle is on the horizon as a petition has been lodged in the Punjab and Haryana High Court against the recently introduced anti-sacrilege law by the Punjab government. This contentious legislation seeks to impose harsher punishments for acts of sacrilege against the sacred Guru Granth Sahib.

The act, known as the Jaagat Jot Sri Guru Granth Sahib Satkar (Amendment) Act, 2026, was passed unanimously by the Punjab assembly and received the governor's assent. However, the petitioner, Simranjeet Singh from Jalandhar, contends that the law is void because it lacks the President's approval, a requirement for laws inconsistent with existing legislation like the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Critically, the petitioner argues that the law enforces a disproportionate penalty structure, mandating life imprisonment for conspiracy to commit sacrilege, and fails to uphold the constitutional principle of ‘Equality before Law’ by excluding other religious texts. This plea challenges the constitutional validity of the act, asserting it to be arbitrary and non-secular.

Give Feedback