Supreme Court Criticizes Delayed Arbitral Awards
The Supreme Court has voiced its concern over undue delays in pronouncing arbitral awards, highlighting potential negative impacts. Unexplained delays can lead to speculation and undermine the arbitration process's credibility. The court stressed that each case should be assessed individually, emphasizing swift dispute resolution's importance.
 
 - Country:
- India
The Supreme Court expressed discontent over significant delays in delivering arbitral awards, noting potential harmful effects on the arbitration process. Such delays, if left unexplained, could lead to speculation and undermine trust.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Satish Chandra Sharma highlighted a case where an arbitrator delayed the pronouncement for years without justification. The case raised questions about the impact of such delays on the validity of awards.
Though a delay alone isn't enough to dismiss an award, cases need individual examination. The court reiterated arbitration aims for swift dispute resolution, underlining amendments to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for time-efficient processes.
ALSO READ
- 
                        Supreme Court Upholds Sealing of New Rajinder Nagar Market Premises
- 
                        U.S. Flight Delays Worsen as Government Shutdown Persists
- 
                        Supreme Court Shields Lawyer-Client Privilege in Landmark Verdict
- 
                        Supreme Court's Ripple: Landmark Decisions and Key Directions Unveiled
- 
                        High Tensions in Supreme Court: Shabir Shah's Bail Plea Controversy
 
                
 
         
         
                     
                     
                     
                     
				 
				 
				 
				 
				