Supreme Court Halts Controversial UGC Regulations on Caste Discrimination
The Supreme Court has placed an interim stay on the 2026 UGC regulations due to its narrow definition of caste-based discrimination, considering it unconstitutional and vague. A broader examination is set for March 19. Meanwhile, petitioners raised concerns over exclusions, divisiveness, and lack of safeguards in the policy.
- Country:
- India
In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India has temporarily blocked the implementation of the 2026 University Grants Commission (UGC) regulations, citing constitutional concerns.
The bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant highlighted that the provisions defining "caste-based discrimination" were vague and risked misuse. During the hearing, Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain and others pointed out that the regulation narrowly protects only Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes, excluding other groups, potentially fostering divisions on university campuses.
Petitioners also warned of inadequate safeguards against retaliation under anti-discrimination laws, particularly affecting students from the General category. The Court has called for a committee of academic experts to review the issue, expressing the need for educational institutions to remain integrated within the broader societal fabric. Further reviews are scheduled for March 19.
ALSO READ
-
Supreme Court Upholds California's Redistricting, Bolstering Democrats
-
Supreme Court Sanctions Partisan Electoral Maps Amidst Constitutional Concerns
-
BJP Slams Mamata Banerjee's 'Flop Drama' in Supreme Court
-
Supreme Court to Hear Plea on Hyatt Regency's Valuation Controversy
-
Supreme Court Upholds Permanent Status and Fair Pay for Contractual Teachers
Google News