Judicial Transfers: Balancing Public Interest and Executive Influence

The government outlined the judicial transfer process to the Lok Sabha, focusing on public interest and administration of justice. Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal addressed concerns about executive interference, detailing the decision-making process led by the Chief Justice of India with consultation among senior judiciary members.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 13-02-2026 18:40 IST | Created: 13-02-2026 18:40 IST
Judicial Transfers: Balancing Public Interest and Executive Influence
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The government emphasized that judicial transfers aim to serve the public interest, as Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal addressed the Lok Sabha. This came amid questions about executive interference in the transfer of high court judges, underscoring the process's integrity and transparency.

Answering a query regarding recent transfer activities, Meghwal detailed the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP), which outlines the framework for judicial relocations. The process is led by the Chief Justice of India in consultation with the four senior-most Supreme Court judges, ensuring a balanced representation of judicial opinions.

Personal factors, including judges' preferences and responses to proposed transfers, are scrutinized. This comprehensive approach strives to uphold justice administration across the nation, highlighted by last year's transfer case involving Justice Atul Sreedharan, revised upon government reconsideration.

Give Feedback