Supreme Court Upholds Public Interest in Cancer Drug Case
The Supreme Court has allowed Zydus Lifesciences to continue selling its biosimilar of the cancer drug Nivolumab, despite patent infringement claims by Bristol Myers Squibb. The decision prioritizes public access to affordable medicines over exclusive rights. Zydus will supply a sample for comparison, with potential high court reevaluation.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Zydus Lifesciences, allowing the company to sell its affordable biosimilar of the cancer drug Nivolumab, amidst ongoing patent protection challenges from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS).
During the hearing, Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi directed that BMS be provided a sample of the biosimilar for direct mapping against their patented product. The court noted that given the impending expiration of the patent in May 2026, limiting access in the final months could harm public welfare.
Zydus has been permitted to market the drug locally until the patent expires, following a Delhi High Court ruling in January in favor of patient access. The ruling highlighted the public interest, emphasizing that continued access to life-saving drugs substantially outweighs the patent holder's exclusive rights, especially when the generic version facilitates wider affordability and reach.
ALSO READ
-
Judicial Officer's Conduct Under Scrutiny: Supreme Court Steps In
-
AstraZeneca on Track for 2030 Target Amid Strong Cancer Drug Demand
-
AstraZeneca Bets on Cancer Drugs for Steady 2026 Growth
-
Mamata Banerjee's Supreme Court Appearance Sparks Controversy
-
Kuldeep Singh Sengar Seeks Supreme Court's Leniency in Unnao Case