Delhi High Court Criticizes Sensational Media Reporting
The Delhi High Court has condemned media practices that report innocuous court remarks to create sensationalism, citing a case involving Shravan Gupta. The court dismissed Gupta's plea to quash a non-bailable warrant in a money laundering case, emphasizing the need for his physical presence in the investigation.
- Country:
- India
The Delhi High Court criticized the media for sensationalizing court remarks, stating that such practices exploit the curiosity of the public by highlighting remarks that are not integral to a case's merits. This observation was made while addressing a plea by businessman Shravan Gupta, accusing media houses of publishing defamatory content.
The High Court further dismissed Gupta's plea seeking the quashing of a non-bailable warrant in a money laundering case. Although Gupta sought to participate in the investigation via video conferencing, the court maintained that his physical presence was necessary, emphasizing the importance of personal attendance in legal proceedings.
The ongoing proceedings against Gupta include serious allegations of financial misconduct linked to the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam. The Enforcement Directorate has accused Gupta of using offshore entities to launder substantial proceeds of crime, urging him to appear in person to address these charges.
ALSO READ
-
Delhi High Court Upholds Non-Bailable Warrant Against Shravan Gupta in AugustaWestland Case
-
Delhi High Court Takes Center Stage: Key Rulings and Remarks
-
Delhi High Court Advocates for Inclusive Sports Award Criteria
-
Delhi High Court Ruling: Flexibility in Law Education Attendance Norms
-
Delhi High Court Steps In For Actor Celina Jaitly's Brother Detained In UAE