Supreme Court to Scrutinize Rajasthan's Controversial Anti-Conversion Law
The Supreme Court has agreed to review petitions challenging Rajasthan's new anti-conversion law. Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta have called for a response from the state government. Petitioners question the Act's constitutionality and its severe penalties for religious conversions, awaiting further legal proceedings.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court has taken up the issue of Rajasthan's recent anti-conversion law, agreeing to examine petitions contesting its legality. A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta has issued a notice to the Rajasthan government, requesting a reply within four weeks regarding the concerns raised.
The contentious Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2025, implemented last month, faces scrutiny over its significant penalties, including lengthy imprisonment terms spanning from seven years to life for certain offenses. Petitioners argue that the law breaches constitutional rights, and seek a suspension of the Act pending a final court decision.
The Supreme Court is considering broader issues related to similar laws across multiple states, addressing concerns on the legal framework surrounding religious conversions. As the apex court awaits responses from several states, the outcome could have significant ramifications on nationwide anti-conversion legislation.
ALSO READ
-
Supreme Court Seeks Clarity on Bandra Worli Sea Link Land Reclamation's Beneficiaries
-
Supreme Court Upholds Aakash's EGM Amid Glas Trust Challenge
-
Supreme Court Grants Vodafone Idea Relief on AGR Dues
-
DMK Challenges Election Commission's Special Electoral Roll Revision in Supreme Court
-
Supreme Court Mandates Massive Urban Afforestation for Delhi Pollution Control