Federal Courts Rule Trump-Appointed Attorneys' Appointments Unlawful

A U.S. district judge has ruled Bilal Essayli's appointment as acting U.S. attorney for Central California was unlawful, creating a leadership vacuum in the nation's most populous district. The ruling doesn't invalidate indictments he oversaw. Similar appointments under the Trump administration have been challenged, including Alina Habba in New Jersey.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 29-10-2025 09:44 IST | Created: 29-10-2025 09:44 IST
Federal Courts Rule Trump-Appointed Attorneys' Appointments Unlawful
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

A U.S. district judge has determined that the appointment of Bilal Essayli as acting U.S. attorney for California's central district was unlawful, resulting in a significant leadership gap in one of the nation's busiest federal jurisdictions.

Judge J. Michael Seabright's ruling maintains the validity of three indictments issued during Essayli's tenure, despite his disqualification. This decision mirrors other recent rulings against Trump-era appointments, highlighting potential procedural lapses in federal appointments during that administration.

Essayli was appointed by Attorney General Pam Bondi in March, with a limited 120-day mandate, which expired without appropriate White House action. As the legal battles continue, this ruling contributes to broader scrutiny of Trump administration staffing practices.

Give Feedback