U.S. Counter-Drug Strikes in Pacific Pose Legal and Political Questions

The U.S. conducted strikes on suspected drug vessels in the Pacific, killing 14. This action is part of Trump's counter-drug campaign, but legal experts question the military's role. Tensions with Venezuela and Colombia rise, as Democrats seek clarity on adherence to war laws.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Updated: 28-10-2025 21:55 IST | Created: 28-10-2025 21:55 IST
U.S. Counter-Drug Strikes in Pacific Pose Legal and Political Questions

The United States has stepped up its counter-drug operations in the eastern Pacific, targeting suspected narcotics-trafficking vessels. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced this week that 14 alleged drug traffickers were killed and one survived in these operations.

This move is part of a broader campaign under President Donald Trump, involving a substantial military buildup in the Caribbean, including the deployment of guided-missile destroyers, F-35 fighter jets, and a nuclear submarine. However, the details surrounding these operations remain scarce, raising concerns over legal and political implications.

The operations have sparked criticism from legal experts and Democratic lawmakers who are questioning the military's role in maritime law enforcement, typically handled by the Coast Guard, and whether the strikes comply with international law. The strikes have also heightened tensions with Venezuela and Colombia.

Give Feedback