Debate Intensifies Over Delhi Riots Conspiracy Charges As Court Awaits Verdict
The Delhi riots case involving Umar Khalid and 17 others accused under UAPA witnessed heated arguments as defense counsel challenged the framing of charges. The court adjourned the hearing to November 10 for further deliberations. Concerns were raised over evidence credibility and police preparedness.
- Country:
- India
The contentious Delhi riots case saw significant developments as Umar Khalid’s defense team wrapped up arguments against charge framing. Charged under UAPA, Khalid, along with 17 others, faces allegations of orchestrating a larger conspiracy.
Court deliberations, led by Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai at Karkardooma, have now been postponed until November 10 to hear arguments for co-accused Saleem Khan. Senior Advocate Tridip Pais, representing Khalid, questioned the credibility of evidence, emphasizing the innocuous nature of alleged activities like 'chakka jaam' and meetings.
Pais highlighted discrepancies such as the absence of Umar Khalid from a meeting and lack of violence 'recovery' evidence. As police assert a conspiracy led to tragic February 2020 violence, Khalid’s defense pointed at lapses in police action despite prior intelligence.
ALSO READ
-
Courtroom Beginnings: The Legal Battle of Umar Khalid
-
Activists' Bail Plea in the Spotlight: No Evidence of Conspiracy in 2020 Delhi Riots
-
2020 riots: 'Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam playing victim card,' Delhi Police tells SC
-
Executed 'regime change operation': Delhi Police opposes bail of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in SC
-
Courtroom Drama: Umar Khalid's Counsel Challenges Delhi Riot Charges