Kerala's Sacred Debate: Tradition vs Women's Rights at Sabarimala

In Kerala, key Hindu organizations, the NSS and SNDP Yogam, stand firm against permitting menstruating women entry into the Sabarimala temple, as the Supreme Court reviews related petitions. Despite past traditions and public protests, the apex court's earlier verdict allowed entry, sparking ongoing debate over faith and gender rights.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Kottayam | Updated: 16-02-2026 14:41 IST | Created: 16-02-2026 14:41 IST
Kerala's Sacred Debate: Tradition vs Women's Rights at Sabarimala
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Supreme Court's impending decision on women’s entry to Kerala's Sabarimala temple has reignited a cultural standoff. The Nair Service Society (NSS) and Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana (SNDP) Yogam, two influential Hindu organizations, have reiterated their opposition to allowing menstruating women into the sacred hill shrine.

NSS General Secretary G Sukumaran Nair expects the state government to adhere to traditional practices despite past Supreme Court rulings permitting entry. The SNDP, representing the Ezhava community, echoed similar sentiments, emphasizing tradition and public sentiment over the apex court's decision.

Widespread protests followed the 2018 Supreme Court ruling permitting women of all ages to enter Sabarimala. The current review petitions have prompted both organizations to stand their ground, underscoring the complex interplay between religious traditions and evolving gender rights.

Give Feedback