Smarter carbon governance: AI integration boosts sustainability in enterprises

The findings also suggest that AI’s impact grew stronger after 2018, coinciding with China’s tightening carbon policies and the maturing of digital infrastructure. The authors identify two primary channels through which AI enhances carbon performance: by improving ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance and stimulating green innovation. These mechanisms together form the backbone of AI’s contribution to sustainable cleaner production.


CO-EDP, VisionRICO-EDP, VisionRI | Updated: 24-10-2025 17:15 IST | Created: 24-10-2025 17:15 IST
Smarter carbon governance: AI integration boosts sustainability in enterprises
Representative Image. Credit: ChatGPT

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the path toward corporate sustainability, according to a new study from Wonkwang University, Republic of Korea.

The research, published in Systems under the title "Artificial Intelligence Empowerment and Carbon Emission Performance: A Systems Perspective on Sustainable Cleaner Production," provides the first comprehensive evidence that AI empowerment significantly enhances firms' carbon emission performance (CEP) in China's evolving industrial landscape.

How artificial intelligence redefines cleaner production

The study frames AI not simply as a digital upgrade but as a systemic production tool transforming carbon governance and cleaner manufacturing. Drawing from a dataset of 3,404 Chinese A-share listed firms between 2013 and 2023, the researchers used a two-way fixed-effects model to capture the relationship between AI empowerment and carbon outcomes. They found that AI-enabled firms consistently outperform non-AI adopters in emission reduction efficiency, marking a transition toward what the authors call an "intelligence-driven production paradigm."

The study introduces a dynamic learning game model that combines a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) production function, an AI-enabled abatement function, and institutional constraints. This model captures how firms balance productivity and emissions under resource and regulatory limits. The analysis reveals that AI integration allows companies to automate emission tracking, optimize energy allocation, and reconfigure production systems to minimize waste.

The findings also suggest that AI's impact grew stronger after 2018, coinciding with China's tightening carbon policies and the maturing of digital infrastructure. The authors identify two primary channels through which AI enhances carbon performance: by improving ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance and stimulating green innovation. These mechanisms together form the backbone of AI's contribution to sustainable cleaner production.

The mechanisms behind AI's carbon impact

AI influences carbon efficiency through both governance and technological innovation. The first mechanism, enhanced ESG performance, arises from the integration of data-driven tools that increase transparency, strengthen monitoring, and support environmental accountability. AI systems, through predictive monitoring and automated compliance checks, enable firms to reduce governance gaps and enforce internal sustainability standards. This raises the implicit cost of exceeding emission limits and reinforces adherence to green policies.

The second mechanism, green innovation capability, emerges as AI boosts firms' ability to sense, seize, and reconfigure resources for low-carbon technologies. AI-driven insights encourage the development of eco-friendly processes and support the diffusion of digital environmental technologies. The study's empirical analysis confirms that AI adoption significantly correlates with higher green patent activity and sustainable product development, showing that innovation mediates the link between digitalization and emission reduction.

The researchers also highlight the dual-edged nature of AI. While it enhances efficiency, AI's energy-intensive model training can partially offset environmental gains, a phenomenon referred to as the "rebound effect." This underscores the importance of coupling digital decarbonization with cleaner energy systems to avoid eroding AI's net environmental benefits.

Institutional and managerial contexts shape AI's effectiveness

The study explores how institutional environments and managerial backgrounds moderate AI's effectiveness. The results show that firms in regions with higher levels of marketization experience stronger AI-induced improvements in carbon performance. A mature market environment, characterized by better property rights, transparent disclosure systems, and advanced digital infrastructure, amplifies AI's positive effects.

On the other hand, executives with overseas experience appear to weaken AI's impact in low-marketization regions. The authors attribute this to institutional misalignment, foreign management practices may not fully adapt to local regulatory structures, reducing the effectiveness of AI-powered carbon governance. However, in more marketized contexts, overseas expertise becomes an asset, reinforcing innovation diffusion and compliance with advanced ESG standards.

The analysis also identifies ownership and industry heterogeneity. Private firms and those in non-pollution-intensive sectors benefit more directly from AI empowerment, while state-owned and heavy-polluting industries display flatter responses. The study concludes that digital transformation yields the greatest sustainability gains when institutional incentives, managerial adaptability, and ownership structures align with AI-driven reforms.

Toward smarter decarbonization policies

The research recommends that governments tailor AI adoption incentives to firm characteristics, linking subsidies and tax deductions to measurable sustainability outcomes. For state-owned enterprises, financial support should depend on transparent AI-enabled emission auditing. For private firms, particularly in low-emission industries, tax incentives for data-sharing and cloud-based systems could accelerate adoption.

The authors also call for addressing AI's rebound effect by investing in energy-efficient data centers and renewable-powered infrastructure. Policymakers are urged to standardize carbon data systems, promote cross-firm learning, and strengthen digital governance frameworks that ensure AI serves sustainable ends.

The paper concludes that AI empowerment is not a substitute for environmental policy but a strategic complement to it. Its potential to advance the "dual carbon" goals, carbon peaking by 2030 and neutrality by 2060, depends on whether firms, regulators, and innovators can balance digital growth with ecological integrity.

  • FIRST PUBLISHED IN:
  • Devdiscourse
Give Feedback