Supreme Court Debates SEC's Disgorgement Power

The U.S. Supreme Court is evaluating the scope of the SEC's disgorgement power, a financial remedy aimed at reclaiming profits from illegal activities. The case, involving Ongkaruck Sripetch, raises questions about whether the SEC must prove victims suffered economic harm before seeking disgorgement. A decision is expected by June.

Supreme Court Debates SEC's Disgorgement Power

The U.S. Supreme Court appeared inclined on Monday to support the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) use of disgorgement, a powerful financial tool designed to recover profits from unlawful activities. The case in question concerns Ongkaruck Sripetch, who is challenging the SEC's authority.

The crux of the issue is whether the SEC must demonstrate that victims experienced financial harm before it can mandate the surrender of illegal profits. Justices from both sides of the political spectrum questioned this criterion, while the defendant's lawyer argued that disgorgement without proven harm amounts to punishment.

Despite concerns about the potential overreach of this financial remedy, the court seems likely to narrow its ruling to the case's specifics, leaving broader questions for future deliberations. The decision, which could have implications for the SEC's enforcement strategy, is due by June's end.

Give Feedback