Debate Over Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code Revisions Sparks Controversy in Rajya Sabha
The Rajya Sabha saw heated discussions over the government's amendments to the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC), highlighting issues like significant creditor haircuts and infrastructure bottlenecks at the NCLT. Critics argue that these changes benefit large defaulters, while the process continues to struggle with inefficiency and misuse.
- Country:
- India
The Rajya Sabha on Wednesday witnessed intense criticism directed at the government's frequent amendments to the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC), highlighting significant haircuts for creditors and alleged favoritism towards larger corporate defaulters.
Debate on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026, has brought to light ongoing infrastructure issues at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and increasing case backlogs threatening judicial efficiency. Critics argue the amendments have not addressed these major concerns.
Sukhendu Sekhar Ray of AITC criticized the government's handling of the insolvency law, describing it as a means to favor large corporate defaulters. He highlighted the substantial financial losses incurred by banks due to haircuts, asserting the bill facilitates asset stripping over genuine resolutions.
ALSO READ
-
Parliament Fast-Tracks Insolvency Law Amendments
-
Insolvency Code Revitalizes Indian Banking: A Game-Changer in Economic Legislation
-
India Revamps Insolvency Framework with Key IBC Amendments
-
Parliament passes Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026.
-
Contentious CAPF Bill Sparks Fierce Debate in Rajya Sabha