Supreme Court Debates Retrospective Environmental Clearances

The Supreme Court discussed the contentious issue of retrospective environmental clearances for projects that violate green norms. Lawyer Srishti Agnihotri emphasized the necessity of securing prior environmental clearances as a substantive safeguard, warning against reducing the 'polluter pays' principle to a mere 'pollute and pay' approach.

Agnihotri cited international conventions like the Rio Declaration in her arguments. She cautioned that relaxing norms could lead to potential misuse and harmful breaches in areas like earthquake zones or erosion-prone regions, where public funds might be wasted.

Despite these concerns, the government defended its stance, explaining its strict procedures for violators. The hearing remains unresolved and is set to continue, as justices expressed concerns about enforcement effectiveness and government accountability in ensuring environmental compliance.