Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Advisory on Vande Mataram

The Supreme Court rejected a plea objecting to the Ministry of Home Affairs' advisory on singing 'Vande Mataram', emphasizing its non-mandatory nature. Petitioners fear potential discrimination for not singing it, citing past precedents of non-compulsory patriotism. The court assured liberty to readdress if any penal consequences arise.

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Advisory on Vande Mataram
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea challenging a recent advisory by the Ministry of Home Affairs regarding the singing of 'Vande Mataram' during official events and schools. The court emphasized that the circular is advisory, not mandatory, mitigating fears of potential discrimination for non-compliance.

CJI Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi, clarified that the circular's use of the word 'may' signals its non-compulsory nature, aligning with past court precedents that patriotism cannot be enforced. Petitioners were assured the right to return to court should penal consequences be imposed later.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta referenced constitutional duties to respect national symbols, but the court encountered arguments stressing individual conscience and tolerance. The bench maintained openness to future grievances that suggest any compulsory enforcement against the advisory.

TRENDING

OPINION / BLOG / INTERVIEW

From Ideas to Impact: ADB’s New Model for Technology Innovation in Development

Georgia Eyes Green Growth Through New Circular Economy Economic Zones Strategy

Inside Pakistan’s Schooling Gap: Why Millions of Children Remain Out of Class

Beyond the Grid: Rethinking Africa’s Path to Sustainable Electrification

DevShots

Latest News

Connect us on

LinkedIn Quora Youtube RSS
Give Feedback