Judge Blocks Pentagon's Restrictive Press Policy
A federal judge halted the Pentagon’s policy that labeled journalists as security risks for seeking unauthorized information. The New York Times argued this violated constitutional freedoms, as the policy stifled free press. Most media outlets opposed the policy, and Justice Department’s defense was rejected.
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's new Pentagon press policy, which threatened to label journalists as security risks for seeking unauthorized information. The lawsuit, filed by the New York Times, claimed the policy allowed the Pentagon to freeze out reporters, infringing on constitutional rights.
Judge Paul Friedman emphasized the essential need for public access to diverse government perspectives, especially after President Trump's actions in Venezuela and Iran. The Pentagon is expected to appeal the court's decision, while the ruling was hailed as a win for press freedom by advocacy groups.
The policy, approved by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, was meant to revoke press credentials from journalists soliciting unauthorized disclosures. With most major media outlets opposing, a new pro-Trump press corps emerged. Legal disputes continue, highlighting alleged viewpoint discrimination.
Google News