Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Data Demands in SNAP Controversy
A federal judge has halted the Trump administration's efforts to cut funding from Democratic-led states over data sharing demands related to the SNAP program. Judge Maxine Chesney ruled the USDA's demands as inconsistent with SNAP laws, emphasizing the protection of data for millions of recipients.
A federal judge in San Francisco has issued a preliminary injunction preventing the Trump administration from slashing funds to 22 Democratic-led states unless they comply with data-sharing requirements regarding food stamp recipients.
U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney acted after the USDA requested personal information, including immigration status, of millions benefiting from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The ruling holds that the USDA's data demands contradict SNAP's governing laws.
The injunction safeguards the integrity and privacy of the SNAP program, particularly benefiting immigrants and vulnerable populations, aligning with previous rulings that rebuffed similar threats by the USDA under the Trump administration.
ALSO READ
-
Indian Nationals Lead UK Visa Extensions: A Migration Snapshot
-
FREED Secures INR 60 Crore in Series A2 Funding to Expand Debt Relief Platform
-
Urgent Call to Boost Nature-Based Solutions Funding at World Summit
-
South Sudan: Funding gaps threaten nearly 2 million displaced people
-
Barcelona Tourism Tax Hike: Funding Progress or Driving Tourists Away?
Google News