Court Warns Against Social Media Abuses of Judiciary
The Allahabad High Court cautioned social media users against abusive remarks about the judiciary, emphasizing that such comments do not qualify as fair criticism and may lead to contempt action. The court dropped contempt charges against advocate Hari Narayan Pandey, highlighting his apology and recognizing his professional conduct.
- Country:
- India
The Allahabad High Court has issued a stern warning to social media users who direct abusive comments at the judiciary. The court stated that such remarks fall outside the realm of fair criticism and could result in strict contempt actions.
Justices J J Munir and Pramod Kumar Srivastava emphasized that virtual abuses aimed at the judiciary do not constitute informed criticism. The court's observations were made during a criminal contempt case involving advocate Hari Narayan Pandey, who admitted his distress during the incident.
While the court dropped the contempt proceedings, acknowledging Pandey's sincere apology, it reiterated that social media users must exercise restraint and adhere to lawful criticism when commenting on judicial matters.
ALSO READ
-
Supreme Court Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Textbook Over Judiciary Corruption Chapter
-
Supreme Court Blocks Controversial NCERT Book Over Judiciary Criticism
-
Supreme Court Bans NCERT Book: A Controversy Over Judiciary Critique
-
Judiciary vs. Education: The Controversial Class 8 Textbook Ban
-
We have utmost respect for judiciary, court's directives will be complied with: Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan on NCERT textbook row.