Supreme Court Denies Bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in Delhi Riots Case
The Supreme Court denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots case, citing prima facie evidence under the UAPA linking them to strategic roles in the riots. Five others were granted bail under strict conditions. The court underscored the constitutional balance between liberty and public order.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court on Monday refused bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, both implicated in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy. The court highlighted that these two defendants, unlike five others who were granted bail, play a central role in the allegations of planning and mobilizing riot activities.
Incarcerated since 2020, Khalid and Imam face accusations under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, with justices citing evidence of their involvement in orchestrating the 'chakka jam' strategy and mobilizing resources, which led to the February 2020 riots during protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).
While emphasizing the paramount importance of liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution, the court stressed that public safety and the integrity of the trial process are equally vital, justifying the denial of their bail based on the prima facie case against them, as per the stringent UAPA conditions.
ALSO READ
-
Delhi riots case: Court acquits man accused of arson, rioting
-
Delhi riots case: Court grants interim bail to Khalid Saifi, bars him from using social media
-
Court denies bail to three 2020 Delhi riots accused, Salim Malik, Athar Khan and former MLA Tahir Hussain.
-
Bail Parity Sought in 2020 Delhi Riots Case Amid Supreme Court Decisions
-
UPA govt brought amendments to UAPA: Owaisi blames Congress for prolonged detention of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam