Supreme Court Dismisses Compensation Plea on Mob Lynching

The Supreme Court dismissed a plea by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind for Uttar Pradesh to compensate mob lynching victims, advising them to engage state authorities. The plea had sought enforcement of the apex court's guidelines following the Tehseen Poonawalla case on preventing, remedying, and penalizing mob violence incidents.


Devdiscourse News Desk | New Delhi | Updated: 03-11-2025 13:00 IST | Created: 03-11-2025 13:00 IST
Supreme Court Dismisses Compensation Plea on Mob Lynching
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, which sought a directive mandating the Uttar Pradesh government to compensate victims of mob lynching incidents.

The bench, comprising Justices JK Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi, chose not to intervene with the decision of the Allahabad High Court, which instructed the petitioner to redirect their appeal to the state government.

The petition emphasized shortcomings in the state's adherence to preventive, remedial, and punitive measures recommended by the Supreme Court in the Tehseen Poonawalla case judgment. Although the high court acknowledged the issue's importance, it reiterated that each instance of mob lynching should be handled individually by approaching the appropriate government authority.

TRENDING

DevShots

Latest News

OPINION / BLOG / INTERVIEW

Dynamic Water Systems: The URCA Model’s Blueprint for Resilient Coastal Cities

Balancing Food, Water, and Ecology: Sustainable Farming in China’s Sanjiang Plain

The Great Tobacco Deception: UNDP–WHO Report Exposes Lies Fueling a Global Epidemic

How Smart Fiscal Policies Can Turn Growth into Real Social and Economic Inclusion

Connect us on

LinkedIn Quora Youtube RSS
Give Feedback