Delhi High Court Upholds Penalty Against DANICS Officer in Land Acquisition Case
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a DANICS officer challenging a disciplinary penalty related to a 2016 land acquisition case. The court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, citing no procedural illegality or violation of natural justice in the officer's actions.
- Country:
- India
In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition filed by a Selection Grade DANICS officer, confirming a disciplinary penalty related to a contentious land acquisition order from 2016. This decision aligns with the earlier judgment by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), which had also declined to overturn the penalty.
The controversy stems from the officer's actions as Land Acquisition Collector, where he approved a refund exceeding ₹3.26 crore, treating the acquisition as concluded despite his transfer and date advancement of the hearing. Resulting disciplinary proceedings found he had acted hastily, prompting a penalty that affected his pay, promotion, and seniority.
Challenging this before the CAT and, subsequently, the High Court in 2025, the officer argued procedural fairness and discrimination, notably citing disparate treatment compared to his successor. Both tribunals refuted these claims, emphasizing the lack of procedural violations and the officer's unsubstantiated authority to reverse the acquisition.
ALSO READ
-
Delhi High Court's Merciful Judgment: A Balancing Act of Justice and Forgiveness
-
Delhi High Court Upholds Disciplinary Penalty Against DANICS Officer
-
Godrej Properties Expands Horizons with Strategic Land Acquisitions
-
Godrej Properties Expands Footprint with Major Land Acquisitions
-
Delhi High Court Stays Bail Suspension for Youth Congress President